President Donald Trump says that he is working with Chinese President Xi Jinping to find a way for Chinese telecom company to “get back into business, fast,” following last week’s announcement that it was pausing its “major operating activities.”
ZTE said in a filing that it has just enough cash to remain afloat if it pauses operations following a US ban on exports to the company in April. Last month, The US Department of Commerce banned exports to the company for seven years, saying that it failed to uphold the terms of a plea agreement after it pled guilty to breaking sanctions against Iran and North Korea. The company said that this ban would “severely impact the survival and development of ZTE,” and that it’s bene in talks with the US to try and reverse or change the ban.
President Xi of China, and I, are working together to give massive Chinese phone company, ZTE, a way to get back into business, fast.
Too many jobs in China lost. Commerce Department has been instructed to get it done!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 13, 2018
The company’s predicament has clearly reached the upper levels of government: the telecom company is one of the largest in China, with more than 80,000 employees.
In his tweet, Trump indicated that the company has lost “too many jobs” in China, and that he’s instructed the Department of Commerce to “get it done.”
ZTE’s troubles come after months of scrutiny from the US over concerns that the company could post a risk to national security.
In January, Texas Representative Mike Conaway introduced a bill that would ban US government agencies from using phones and equipment from ZTE and fellow Chinese telecom Huawei, while FCC chairman Ajit Pai confirmed a proposal that would discourage US carriers and wireless providers from purchasing equipment from them.
Earlier this month, the Department of Defense ordered US military bases to stop selling Huawei and ZTE phones.
The company faces similar scrutiny in the UK, where the cybersecurity watchdog National Cyber Security Centre issued a letter warning against the company’s use or services.
Ultimate Ears has announced that voice control on Spotify and Spotify Connect is now available on its Blast and Megablast wireless speakers.
The speakers, which have far-field microphones for Amazon Alexa built in, will respond to Spotify commands.
Now, you can ask things like, “Alexa, play my Discover Weekly” or “Alexa, play Spotify” to then play anything available on the music service.
The Blast and Megablast speakers have also integrated Spotify Connect, which allows you to use the Spotify app as a remote and listen on other devices without pairing through Bluetooth.
When on Wi-Fi, open the Spotify app and choose your UE speaker under Devices Available.
Other music services supported on the Blast and Megablast include Amazon Music, Deezer, and TuneIn globally, as well as Pandora, iHeartRadio, and SiriusXM in the US.
This week, the South China Morning Post reported that Chinese companies are “mining data directly from workers’ brains” using wireless sensors in hats. The article is full of exciting quotes about employers using technology to monitor their workers’ emotions, but the reality is that these hats probably don’t work very well.
The report is low on details, so the claims should be taken with a grain of salt. Allegedly, workers wear safety hats or uniform hats that have wireless sensors inside.
These sensors pick up brain activity to send to an algorithm. The algorithm then interprets the data into various emotional states — for example, depression, anxiety, and rage — so managers can use the information to better plan break times and help everyone be efficient. Hangzhou Zhongheng Electric has been using it on its 40,000 workers since 2014 and has boosted profits by £315 million since then, according to one official who then refused to say more.
If true, Hangzhou Zhongheng Electric’s program brings up tricky ethical questions about how much privacy employees should have.
But even if Hangzhou was mandating these hats, they’re not doing much because the technology for advanced “emotional surveillance” is not here yet. It’s not for a lack of trying; researchers, startups, and the US military have long worked on similar projects. But big obstacles remain, and these sensors and gadgets can’t accurately “read minds.”
The Chinese program uses the sensors to record electrical signals in the brain, which is called electroencephalography (EEG).
In EEG, electrodes record the brain’s neurons through the scalp. This brain activity can show us patterns and tell us if there’s something abnormal, but there are plenty of limitations.
First and foremost, we still don’t know how to perfectly record brain signals, says Barry Giesbrecht, a professor of psychology at the University of California at Santa Barbara and director of its Attention Lab. “EEG sensors are not only sensitive to brain activity, but any kind of electrical activity,” says Giesbrecht. So blinking or clenching your jaw could lead to a false positive, as could movement and sweat.
In experiments, researchers have their subjects blink and do small movements so they can teach the device not to count those signals as brain signals.
But in a real-world setting, and with thousands of workers, this type of calibration would be much harder to do. Plus, while medical EEG uses “wet” sensors applied with a gel, a device like the Chinese hat is dry, and dry sensors are more likely to pick up noise.
Second, the algorithm that interprets the data might not be very good. (It’s hard to know here because, again, the article is low on details.) And finally, while EEG can tell us whether someone is awake or asleep, complex emotional states like depression and anxiety are another story. We don’t yet have a sophisticated enough understanding of which patterns of brain activity match which emotional stages, adds Giesbrecht.
It’s not far-fetched to believe that we will figure this out one day; after all, changes in emotion will show up as changes in the EEG.
But until then, it’s hard to pick up and interpret.
So though the article is full of words like “emotional surveillance program” and “mental keyboard,” for now it makes more sense to be concerned about the ethical question of employers using it en masse than to worry about employers somehow reading minds.